Refugees, Women, and Weapons : International Norm Adoption and Compliance in Japan

In a world dominated by considerations of material and security threats, Japan provides a fascinating case for why, and under what conditions, a state would choose to adopt international norms and laws that are seemingly in direct conflict with its domestic norms.

Approaching compliance from within a constructivist framework, author Petrice R.

Flowers analyzes three treaties-addressing refugee policy, women's employment, and the use of land mines-that Japan has adopted.

Refugees, Women, and Weapons probes how international relations and domestic politics both play a role in constructing state identity, and how state identity in turn influences compliance. Flowers argues that, although state desire for legitimacy is a key factor in norm adoption, to achieve anything other than a low level of compliance requires strong domestic advocacy.

She offers a comprehensive theoretical model that tests the explanatory power of two understudied factors: the strength of nonstate actors and the degree to which international and domestic norms conflict.

Flowers evaluates how these factors, typically studied and analyzed individually, interact and affect one another.